Code source de exo2-4-correction.html

<!doctype html>
<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <meta charset="utf-8" />
    <title>Cours R102 - Chapitre 2 - Exercice 4 -
    correction</title>
    <link rel="stylesheet" href="exo2-4.css" />
  </head>
  <body>
    <h1>The New Revolution</h1>
    <p class="subtitle">The machines are about to start
    a revolution. But this time, we might well be the victims. Full
    automation of weapons is on the way.</p>
    <p>In any case, we're now witnessing an unprecedented proliferation
    of <em>weapons technology.</em> They include more bombs,
    weapons of mass destruction, advanced weapons like the Taser and Munition
    Cannon, and weapons that aren't just about <em>fighting</em>
    but whoopees like the <attr title="United States">US</attr>
    Strategic Missile Treaty, as well as nuclear weapons.</p>

    <p>A few dozen of these weapons are now available. In
    the <attr title="United States">US</attr> we can
    manufacture more, using the same production systems as in Pakistan
    where we produced the <attr title="Intercontinental Ballistic
    Missiles">ICBMs</attr>. These weapons should be on the move
    with increased precision and reliability.</p>
    <p>They will soon have <em>nuclear weapons.</em>
    According to Wikipedia, these <em>non-nuclear weapons</em>
    are: a <q>black, highly explosive ballistic missile, an unguided
    nuclear weapon, or a single, unguided, or highly accurate semi-guided
    weapon.</q> That makes these <em>weapons</em>
    a new type of warhead and a <em>weapon</em> as far
    as they belong—or are they as far beyond that as the use of the
    concept of <em>warships</em> and of <em>nuclear
    energy.</em></p>

    <p>The idea that these weapons exist is a logical fallacious one,
    but it is based on history and it is the most widely-known and hotly
    disputed piece of evidence that the war in Iraq is a proxy war between
    Saddam Hussein and Islamic State (<attr title="Islamic State of Iraq
    and Syria">ISIS</attr>) rebels that both use weapons of mass
    destruction against innocent Syrians (such as chlorine gas).</p>
    <h2>Conspiracy theories</h2>

    <p>And to paraphrase the book <em>Paganism</em>
    by Philip Roth of <q>The Kingdom is not at Dawn, and there
    is nothing that we can do about it,</q> you can see that the
    <attr title="Weapons of Mass Destruction">WMD</attr>
    part remains a part of American law, which has been so effectively
    written and interpreted that it gives the president license to use
    its force.</p>

    <p>But <em>weapons of mass destruction</em>
    is not a new doctrine. According to several <em>conspiracy
    theories</em> on the Internet, that's where <em>nuclear
    holocaust</em> comes from.</p>
    <p id="suspense">But at the time, it didn't have
    the <em>nuclearity</em> of <em>nuclear
    war.</em></p>
    <hr/>
    <p class="footnote">Note: ce texte a été (à part le
    premier paragraphe et les deux titres) entièrement écrit par
    DeepAI. Il ne veut a priori rien dire. Considérez-le comme du <a
    href="https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorem_ipsum"><em>Lorem
    Ipsum</em></a>.</p>

  </body>
</html>

Lien de téléchargement de exo2-4-correction.html