`` Although it is not well known, Kummer at one time believed he had found
a complete proof of Fermat's theorem...Seeking the best critic for his proof,
Kummer sent his manuscript to Dirichlet...After a few days, Dirichlet replied
with the opinion that the proof was excellent and certainly correct, provided
the numbers in
could not only be decomposed into indecomposable
factors, as Kummer proved, but that this could be done in only one way. If
however, the second hypothesis couldn't be satisfied, most of the theorem
for the arithmetic of numbers in
would be unproven and the proof
of Kummer's theorem would fall apart. Unfortunately, it appeared to him that
the numbers in
didn't actually possess this property in general. ''
Kurt Hensel, Commemoration of the first centennial of Kummer's
birth (1910) [Ribenboim 2].
Cet apologue est semblable à celui qui, en 1847, arriva à Lamé :
lorsqu'il présenta sa démonstration du théorème de Fermat à
l'Académie, il se vit aussitôt opposer
une objection dirimante de Liouville qui fit remarquer une non unicité
potentielle de la
décomposition en facteurs irréductibles d'expressions polynomiales en
racines énièmes de l'unité (confer Compte
rendu des séances de l'Académie des Sciences, séance du 1er
mars 1847).